The pro analysis and you will suggestions publication writers within their conclusion and guarantee that authored scientific studies are good, rigorous, and you may credible. Writers pick fellow reviewers mainly because of their from inside the-depth experience with the subject matter otherwise methods of the work he’s questioned to check on. It options was indispensable and irreplaceable. Fellow writers was guilty of the precision and viewpoints expressed inside the the profile, as well as the peer feedback procedure operates on a principle of shared trust anywhere between writers, writers and you will publishers. Despite rapid advances, generative AI gadgets has considerable limitations: they are able to lack up-to-go out studies that can establish nonsensical, biased or false pointers. Manuscripts also can include delicate or proprietary information which will perhaps not become mutual outside of the fellow opinion process. Hence i inquire that, whenever you are Springer Characteristics examines getting all of our fellow reviewers that have use of safer AI units, fellow reviewers do not upload manuscripts for the generative AI systems.
Or no part of the review of the states made in the fresh new manuscript was in in whatever way supported by a keen AI unit, we ask fellow writers to declare the usage of such equipment transparently in the peer remark report.
Citations
Lookup content and low-look stuff (e.g. Thoughts, Comment, and you will Commentary articles) need to mention compatible and you can related literature to get the fresh new claims produced. Excessive mind-ticket, coordinated work certainly numerous people to help you with each other self-cite, gratuitous and you may so many solution out-of blogs typed from the log so you can which the paper could have been filed, and just about every other brand of admission control is actually inappropriate.
Citation control can lead to this article are refused, and could be said so you can authors’ associations. Furthermore, people attempts by the fellow-writers otherwise writers to help you encourage such methods are going to be reported by the article authors into the blogger.
- Writers should think about another direction when preparing its manuscript:
- Any declaration about manuscript one to depends on outside resources of pointers (we.e. perhaps not the brand new authors’ own the brand new records or results otherwise standard knowledge) is always to explore a citation.
- Article writers is avoid citing derivations regarding unique performs. Including, they have to mention the initial work instead of an assessment article that cites a unique work.
- People is to make certain that the citations is actually accurate (we.age. they should guarantee the citation helps new statement made in its manuscript and should not misrepresent an alternate works by the mentioning they in the event that it generally does not support the section new authors desire to create).
- Experts ought not to cite provide that they have perhaps not realize.
- Writers should not preferentially mention their otherwise the friends’, peers’, otherwise institution’s products.
- Article authors should end mentioning functions exclusively from one country.
- Writers should avoid using an excessive amount of citations to support one point.
- Preferably, people is always to cite offer that have gone through peer opinion in which you’ll.
- Article authors ought not to mention advertisements otherwise advertorial procedure.
Preprint revealing and you will pass
BMC journals prompt send out-of preprints out of number 1 look manuscripts to your preprint host of the authors’ choice, authors’ or organization websites, and unlock correspondence between experts whether on neighborhood preprint server otherwise preprint placing comments systems.
Preprints is actually recognized as an author’s kind of a report manuscript just before certified fellow review at the a journal, that is deposited for the a general public servers (as the explained in the Preprints with the existence sciences. Research 352, 899901; 2016); preprints are published when for the fellow comment process. Upload from preprints is not sensed past book and will not jeopardize thought within BMC guides. Manuscripts released on examiner ce site preprint server may not be taken into consideration when deciding the improvement provided with a survey involved at the a BMC journal.
BMC has hitched with Research Square ( BMC has a majority interest in Research Square) to provide Inside Comment, a diary-integrated provider for preprint revealing, support article authors around the all teams we are designed to share its search early. Article authors entry to some BMC guides are also able to in public places display information regarding the peer review as a result of Into the Comment. Standard details about From inside the Remark within BMC plus the Search Square preprint system exists right here that is where .